SIMON E. SOBELOFF

Simon E. Sobeloff

Jewish Law Society

 

COMMITTED TO THE PURSUIT OF EXCELLENCE IN LAW AND ETHICS

  

 Membership-Join Now
 Calendar of Events
 Photographs
 Mission Statement
 Biography
 Home
Board of Directors
Steven G. Salant, President
Brian Barke, Treasurer
Laurel Anchors, Secretary
CONTACT US BY E-MAIL
Contact: Steven G. Salant     P.O. Box 1312                 Rockville, Maryland 20849  or Contact: Brian Barke              301 309-8300

                  

 

 

Introduction

SIMON E. SOBELOFF

by 

Michael S. Mayer

(reprinted by permission of author)

 

Simon E. Sobeloff 

Perhaps Judge David L. Bazelon said it best: “Simon Sobeloff was a wise and perceptive human being, a warm friend, and a great judge.”  Simon E. Sobeloff’s career in the law spanned fifteen-nine years, most of which were devoted to public service.  From 1919 until his death in 1973, years which witnessed the great political and social upheavals of the twentieth century, Judge Sobeloff addressed himself to issues such as progressive reform at the city level, prohibition, censorship, depression, war, civil rights, civil liberties, legislative reapportionment, and reform of the criminal justice system.  Consistently he took the side of the less fortunate and the persecuted.  His close friend, Governor Theodore Roosevelt McKelden, called him, simply, “the champion of the underdog.”  Above all, Sobeloff was dedicated to the belief that the law existed to see justice done.  While recognizing that courts operate within the constraints of statute and precedent, he refused to allow technicalities and fine legal points to deny justice.  Committed to insuring that justice did not belong only to the wealthy and powerful, he exhibited an activist’s concern that the courts take an aggressive role in redressing grievances of politically impotent minorities.  To his way of thinking, the legal system functioned best when racial, religious, or ethnic minorities, the poor, or the politically unpopular received fair treatment. 

            Devoted to principle, he never hesitated to advocate an unpopular cause and often became the center of controversy as a result.  Nevertheless, the Baltimore Sun observed that he managed to escape “most of the obloquy that is the normal lot of persons in pubic life.”  His personality and style had a good deal to do with the fact that a reporter, after reviewing, “voluminous newspaper articles and editorials,” found “almost nothing of a censorious nature.”  He was a kind and gentle man who avoided excessive partisanship.  His family knew him as a devoted husband, loving father, and a doting grandfather.  Friends remarked on his personal magnetism, loyalty, integrity, intelligence, charm, and wit.